y 200 9 rece ived in
9. By ano ther faxe d lette r date d 17th R'eb ruar
d the Cou rt to
the Reg istry on the sam e day, Sen egal requ este
are a repl y to the
exte nd the time limi t "to enab le it to bett er prep
11
app lkal ion •
the
dcr dttte d 6 1" Mar ch 200 9, rhc Cou rt gran ted
l 200 9, the peri od
requ est of Scnc gnl and exte nded . up Lo 14th Apri
with m \·V hlch to sub mit its reply to the appl icat ion.
10. By an
01
lican t, and on
J l. A copy of the orde r was serv ed on the App
ch 200 9.
Sen egal , bv facs imil e tran sm.i ssio n date d 7th Mar
with in U1e time
12. Sen egal subm itted its stat eme nt of defe nce
whi ch it rais ed
limi t ind1 caLc d in the afor esai d orcieT, in
tion of the Cou rt and
prcl !min arv obje ctio ns rega rdin g 1he juri sdic
ress ed subs tant ive
adm tssib ility of the nppl icati on. and also add
lSSU CS
cove ring leite r of
13. The Reg istry serv ed on the App lican t, und er
by Sene gal.
14 1., Apn l 200 9, n cop.v of the stat eme nt of defe nce
to the said stat eme nt,
14. Thc AppiH;a nt havi ng faikc i to resp ond
111
200 9, noti fied the
the 1-<vgls\J-_v by ano ther let tcr da lc:d 19 Jun e
30 days , Lhe Cou rt
Appl1c.:ant !.hat if he frulc d to resp ond with in
any subm issio n in
wou ld nssu mc thnl he chd nol wan t to pres ent
"":ith Rule 52 (5) of
repl ) to lhc stat eme nt or deft :nce , in acco rdan ce
lhc Rule s .
d rece ipt of lhe
15. On 29th .July 200 9, the App lican t ackn owl edge
afor e-m enti oned
sta tcm ent of de fenc e and su bmi11ed lhat : "the
y lo sign ifica ntly
repl v d 1d noL in lrod uce any new clcm <'nl likel
icat ion. I ther efor e
mod 1(' the vicwR T exp ress ed in my initi al appl
and resu bmi t mys elf to
rnam lam the said view s in thei r enti rely ,
the aulh orit. Y of the Cou rt.''
it nece ssar y t~
16. In viev~· of HJC fac.:Ls, the Cou rt did not deem clos e the ~as
..
to
hold a pub lic hear ing and , co:1 sequ en 11y, deci ded
,
,~-for clcll bcr:J lion.
M~
__..
~
//
I
'J-L
~
---1--------1
~
/"