9 By letter dated 15 February, 2013 , the Registry sent a letter to SERAP reminding the latter of its letter dated 24 Septembe r, 2012 . 10 As at the date of this Order, SERAP had not responded to either the Registry's letter of 24 September 2012 or to the reminder of 15 February , 2013. Now therefore, the Court having determine d that' (i) The request by SERAP does not comply with Rule 68(2) of the Rules of Court. (1i) SERAP has not responded to the Court's letters and has demonstra ted a lack of interest 1n pursuing the request. UNANOMO USL Y; ORDERS that the request for advisory opinion herein BE and the same is HEREBY struck out for the reason that SERAP lacks interest in pursuing the same Done at Arusha, this fifteenth day of March in the year Two Thousand and Thirteen Signed : ¥4