98. The Court also notes that the publication of decisions of international human rights courts as a measure of satisfaction is of current practice35. Thus, in the case of Rev. 35 See In particular: IACHR: Massacre du Plan de Sanchez v. Guatemala, (Reparations) Judgment of 19 November 2004, paras 102 and 103, IACHR· He/iodoro Portugal v Panama {Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs), Judgment of 12 August 2004, para 248. 30 Christopher Mtkila v. United Republic of Tanzania, the Court itself decided proprio motu to order the publication of one of its decisions as a measure of satisfaction.3