the
45 Tak1 ng into acco unt al1 Lbc circu msta nces of this case,
from the
Cour t is of the view that there is no reaso n for it to depa rt
prov ision s of Rule 30 of its Rule s.
4f>. In vit.·\x.
THl~
or the
foreg oing,
COU RT, unan imou sly .
1) !Told s that, in term s of Artic le 34 (6) of the Proto col,
it has no jurisc iicLio n to hear the case insti tuted by
Mr. Yogo gomb ayc again st Sene gal;
2) Orde rs that each party sha 11 bear jts own costs .
Two
Done al ;\rus ha, this fiftee nth clay of Dece mber in Lhe year
being
Thou sa nd and Nine in F'ren ch and Engl ish , the Fren ch text
auth {' nllt .
Signe d:
'
jACv:'5
- Jean M UTSl NZl, Presi dent
- Soph ia A. B. :\1, UFFO, Vice Prl'S tdcnt
·
,Ju,t in" K. MAF OSO - (;UN I. Judg e
-
Bern ard M. NGO EPE, ,Judg e
Ham di Fara j FANN OUS H .
-
1?
-~
/f)1
1,
v...,u.'
:::'ll ""
~. <1~ fl
Jud~c ~ --
Mocl ibo Toun tv GUlN DO , Judu c
...
. c\
I:'
y
•t...-
,
-{'