they 36. On that score, they claim the following amoun ts based on the list of persons to each conside r to be beneficiaries from each family, and on a lump sum to be granted of them: F for 43 (i) For the beneficiaries of Norbert Zongo, they are claiming 149 million CFA mother , 1 beneficiaries; with 25 million CFA F million for his spouse , 10 million for his 2 million million for each of the six stepmothers, 15 million for each of the five children, uterine for each of the sixteen uterine sisters or step-sisters, and 2 million for each of his brothers or step-brothers.12 F for 37 (ii) The beneficiaries of Ernest Zongo, for their part, are claiming 49 million CFA thers, 2 beneficiaries with 10 million for his mother, 1 million for each of the six step-mo of the million for each of the sixteen uterine sisters or step-sisters, and 2 million for each 13 fourteen brothers or step-brothers. for 07 (iii) As for the beneficiaries of Blaise llboudo, they are claiming 30 CFA F million each of beneficiaries with 10 million for his father, 10 million for his mother, 2 million for the two uterine sisters, and 2 million for each of the three uterine brothers. 29 million (iv) Lastly, the beneficiaries of Abdoul aye Nikiema alias Ablasse are claiming and 2 CFA F for four beneficiaries with 10 million for his mother , 15 million for his son, million for each of his two uterine sisters. nts 37. In its Brief in Response, the Respondent State argues that the individual Applica law or in have failed to adduce sufficient evidence either in terms of Burkinabe domestic to terms of international law to justify their status as beneficiaries which they are claiming be. 12 The exact total is In reality 176 million CFA F million CFA total in exact The ion. explanat any without but rates l Individua same the with nes F for the same benefic1a fact stands at 76 million CFA F. 13 1t is noteworthy that m the corrigendum to the Brief, the Applicants are claiming the sum of64 13