16. In the instant case, the Court, having noted in its aforementioned Judgment of 5 December 2014, violations of the Charter, the Covenant and the Revised ECOWAS Treaty by the Respondent State, the latter is required to make full reparation for the damage it has caused to the Applicant as well as to his family. 17. The Court notes finally that, in the instant case, the internationally wrongful acts which generated the international responsibility of the Respondent State are those referred to in paragraph 6 above. All the reparation claims therefore have to be considered and assessed in relation only to these wrongful acts. 18. In light of the foregoing principles and observations, the Court will now consider the different prayers for reparation made by the Applicant which consist of measures for restitution and repair of the damage, both material and moral, suffered by himself and members of his family. A) On restitution 19. The Applicant maintains that he grounded his Application on the afore-mentioned principles as well as on the extensive jurisprudence on the issue of compensation in seeking full reparation for all the damage caused to him and to his family by the Respondent State. 20. With regard to restitution in particular, he contended that he had to be restored to the status quo ante prior to the violation of the afore-mentioned international obligations by the Respondent State. 21 . As concrete measures of restitution , he prays the Court to order the Respondent State to expunge outright from his judicial records all criminal convictions against him and set aside the other pecuniary sanctions imposed on him. 22. In its Response, the Respondent State indicated that it has no objection to the criminal sentences being expunged from the judicial records of the Applicant, but that the latter has to execute the civil sentences because he had admitted the facts before domestic courts and pleaded guilty to the offense for which he was prosecuted and convicted. The Respondent State however stated that, in this regard, it would defer to the wisdom of the Court. 7