the High Court of Tanzania at Arusha and in resp ect of which he had advised the Director of Public Prosecut ions he would file, vide his letter dated 8 February 2010. This application was found incompetent since, the section und er which it was brou ght, Section 90(1) c (4) of the CPA , had by then , been repealed . v1. A copy of the Attorney General's Notice of Preliminary Objection , Reply to the Applicant's petition and Counter Affidavit in respect of Criminal Application No. 16 of 2011 at the High Court of Tanzania at Arusha. 12. In his letter dated 25 May 2012 to the Registra r, the Applicant maintained that his claim in the app lications before the High Court at Arusha and before the African Court is against the Attorney General as principal legal advisor to the Gov ernm ent of the United Republic of Tanzania, as the pers on responsible for acts don e by officers and agents in his office and in his personal capacity. The Applicant also alleges that the Minister for Home Affairs is 'responsible for abuse of office'. By a letter dated 6 June 2012 , the Registrar acknowledged receipt of this letter and the additional letters he provided as requested, and advised him that the Charter and the Protocol only envisage applications against States thus the registration of his application against the United Republic of Tanzania. 13. By a letter dated 27 June 2012 , the Registrar notif ied the Respondent of the Application . 14. By a letter also dated 27 June 2012, the Registra r notified ~ ~ ~ S ~ @!_- r:P.O.