appf:Aku t:ignin befnrc t.hc same lligh Courl and Lhc srtmc Snpmme Cnun ol Appcfll? 15 . The subtile dislindton belweeu un at.:Uun for tmla""rul lermmttliOn a! lhe contract of employment in term s of the contract its,:lf, and a n action for unlawful dismis!'ml ~cems 1.0 gt'm·:n:d ba~t::d un the r uks nf nutural justlcc, which the Cnurl endorse jpaT<-tgraph r-40[ 1)), Jtnf)ll..Sston IS not wc1ghty enough compared rn thr! drawn from the handling ol this matter by !oral Courl.s, nncl tlte :1ccepumce by the Rcsr-ondcnl Stmr: that )nerd rem!'dt('R lwrl been exhausLr.d. Unch r th es~ circumsmnccs, s1wh t(·chnt~al subtdlty should no1 lu·we been talu.. n intu ac:count by <-t human right-; Cuurt as the sole· and only basis for its conclusion for a matter as sLJiuus as t h~ adrni~sibility (J( the afJplicalion. o. 1 LaSU), it seems to U'• that lhc Court, boving tnkt.:n the initrative of lreatJng tile tSfi1.1C of cxhausdon ol local remcdres, it shnulci ha\'c cxammed all lts faceL~ and emHtre espc•ctally thai Lht! rt"mf'fht•fl 11 was ref<.•rnng the Applicanl l o, were sull availablt and c:frccl iVt!. llnwi'ver smce parties and smce thf• Court 11sell knows. legally srw:Jking, wht::ther rat~ed ff"( OUI'St! Lll~ r~sue w~1s 1101 diF-c u::>st"'d by 1he no qut•stwns on Lhe mr~ncr, to Lhe lligh Court 1~ 110 om• still IJO%ibk ror the Apphc<Jnl. Be it ns it may, then ts nu guaramcc t.hat thts n.:rncdv will bt.! e[[t.;ctive, cspectnlly a::> juclglllerH (.If the Supreme CaLiri uf Appeal hnd rkciclt•d iu it •.., 20U7 U1at the princtplc t1te Applicant on !lnli:!wful (l( res jttrlicta would e:tpplted to the cast· or dismi~snlt, 17. Tlte African Court therefore took its dc-.Jsron v.:iLhoul unv certainty on Ll!e availabiJi ty uf rt:rncdics unci on thci1· effectiveness. In our opwion, under tht! cuTumslanccs, it Rhol.!ld at Court, requested lt.!H~l huvc:, pursw.Jttl JlllflH!~ Lo pruviJc to Rult! ·II of Lhe Hules of won: llifurmallon Oil the exhaustion or local 'l'ht• 1 1 October ·;wo. JUdgment.; ''Wt: shall 110\\' dt~At wtfll thf' hrst gro •md of arp~rtl whlrh I S Jhflt Jw; cmpiO\< lllt!"lll wm; Ulllawfullv l!!lllllnalcd Upon I C'!,rll'lhllg the iwlr,··mf'n f or IIIIN C:ourt 1 wh1r.h ""' '" <ldiv•·~,·ci nn 1' J\11\' !,!nn.•l \\hl,·h \\<J hLJvt• t~>•rtly <'ltt-rl .-;-rr1t••r in th11a jlldRtm<•nl, W• ,.;ui~fled thr,l Llw ts~lll lm rl•• lt'l Plimt tmn nnd 1 h~ f'Hitln~ to tlw appeal Rl't! lh~ Mnw Tl l r< ''"I) clt:ur th11L thiz; case foils 1nto n classtc dcfirutmn ol resju.dicata·· ar•· 6