Respondent that, PALU will be representing the Applicant in the matter. Also by a letter dated 1 Augus t 2012, the Registrar forwarded to PALU, the names and address of the Respo ndenfs representatives in the Application. By a Note Verbale dated 31 Augus t 2012 and received at the Registry by electronic mail on the same date and in hard copy on 3 Septem ber 2012, the Respondent forwarded its Response to 20. the Application. By a letter dated 4 September 2012, the Registrar forwarded to the Applicant, the Respondent's response to the Application and advised him that he has thirty (30) days running from 3 21 . Septem ber 2012, the date when the Response was received at the Registry, to reply to the Response. At its 26th Ordinary Session , the Court decided that PALU be formally served with the Respondent's Response and be granted 22. thirty (30) days from 14 September 2012 to reply to the Respondent's Response and that this communication be copied to the Applicant and the Respondent. By a letter dated 28 September 2012, the Registrar served the Respondent's Response to the Application to PALU and advised that PALU has thirty (30) days from 14 September 2012 23. to reply to the Response. This letter was copied to the Applicant and the Respondent.