VIII. REMEDIES AND REPARATIONS Applicant's Submission 218. The Applicant contends that the remedies of restitution , compensation, satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition would be most suitable to remedy the violations they have suffered by the actions and omissions of the Respondent . 219. On restitution , the Applicant argues that the Ogieks are entitled to the recovery of their ancestral land through delimitation , demarcation and titling process conducted by the relevant Government authorities. With regard to compensation, the Applicant argues that the Ogieks should be granted adequate compensation for all the loss they have suffered . With respect to satisfaction and guarantees of non - repetition, the Applicant recognition rehabilitation of urges the Court to the Ogieks of the as an economic adopt measures indigenous and including full people social of Kenya ; infrastructure; acknowledgment of its responsibility within one year of the date of the judgment ; publication of the official summary of the judgment through a broadcaster with wide coverage in the community's region; and establishing a National Reconciliation Forum to address long-term sources of conflict . Respondent's Submission 220. On the issue of restitution the Respondent contends that the Mau Forest Complex is strictly a nature reserve , and that the Respondent is obliged to protect and conserve it for the benefit of its entire citizenry under its national laws as well as under the African Convention on Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources . 221. On the issue of compensation, the Respondent submits that the Ogieks have adopted modern lifestyles , and as they now exist, they do not depend