indicates the year in which a case was registered, and the date of judgment would not be too long thereafter: in the Supreme Court Case No 38 of 2003, the judgment, referred to earlier, was handed down on 12 July 2004; and in Case No. 24 of 2007, the judgment, also referred to earlier, was handed down on 11 October 2007. For the above reasons: 41. The Court declares this application inadmissible in terms of Article 6(2) of the Protocol, read with Article 56(5) of the Charter. Costs 42.1n accordance with Rule 30 of the Rules of Court, each Party shall bear its own costs. In conclusion, the Court, by a majority of seven votes to three, Vice President Ouguergouz, Judges Niyungeko and Guisse dissenting, decides: 1. that the Application is not admissible. ii. that the Application is struck out. Done in Arusha, on this twenty-first day of the month of June, in the year Two Thousand and Thirteen, in English and in French, the English text being authoritative Signed by: Sophia A.B. AKUFFO, President

Select target paragraph3